Home Forums Football Well look at this about Maiava

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #16465
      Java
      Keymaster

      this just has to be wrong. I’m sure of it.  Because ms “Such As” told us so right here.  That he was only 86% because his receivers were so good.  And that he was way off.

      probably only because he has such a good OC and qb coach running the.  Oh wait. No. It’s not that.  We were told his coach is an idiot and Maiava can’t play.

      I wonder who is wrong. Our resident WNBA expert orNFL scouts?

    • #16470
      BigBalls
      Participant

      Can you imagine completing almost 90% of your passes, three total td’s , no picks,  300 yards in three quarters and some goofball argues you suck because the receivers had to stretch their arms for the ball?

      Even Fraud doesn’t dare to make that argument, he sits back for PT to embarrass himself instead.

       

      • This reply was modified 3 weeks ago by BigBalls.
      • #16474
        PasadenaTrojan
        Participant

        You are really posting/supporting the idea that JM gives shades of Joe Burrow?

        😂🤦‍♂️😂🤦‍♂️😂🤦‍♂️😂🤦‍♂️😂

        For the record JBs Heisman season was prob the greatest season a QB has ever played in college football history. I think it’s between him and Cam.

        And yes he threw more than 15 yard Passes.

      • #16489
        the909
        Participant

        You mean to receivers he’s barely played with and only worked with in camp this year? Those guys? Maiava sucks lol

    • #16494
      BigBalls
      Participant

      PT take the  L on this one. Even Fraud isn’t joining you on this one. This isn’t the game to try and wreck our QB.

      Wait for Maiava to have a bad game in a USC loss. But here is the thing, you are painting yourself into a corner. Now, you are going to sit there watching USC games and hoping Maiava, USC and Riley fail. Do you really want that? Will you enjoy the season hoping we fail so “you can be right”. So you can  post : IM NEVER WRONG!!!.

      The board saw that during the Pete years. Posters arguing “Checkers sucks” and never enjoying one of  the best runs in USC history. You are better than that.

      • #16499
        PasadenaTrojan
        Participant

        as usual you and the Emotional One have it all mixed up.

        i am not trashing on JM because i enjoy it. I want him to beat Joe Bs records. I doubt he will but I will be THRILLED if he does. And that’s the truth.

        You are the ones celebrating a pedestrian/worrisome start since he was often inaccurate and/or late even if stats don’t back me up.

        Does JM remind you of Joe B?  Any part of it? You posted it so you defend the nonsense. And that doesn’t make me a hater. It makes me a realist.

        btw Burrow would throw deep crossing patterns and hit dudes on run. Show me that JM highlight. He also was great on bombs. Also not JM or CLRs forte. Yet????

        and yes that 30 yard “bomb” that Mosley  dropped/well

        defended gives me some hope. Would love to see more.

        Only one taking a loss right now is you. What do you want to bet JM isn’t drafted #1?

      • #16502
        PasadenaTrojan
        Participant

        Another issue that I’ve seen with JM Is that he’s very slow processor. The more he stands around or tries to improvise The worst the outcome is. He’s not inaccurate. He has good arm strength. Hes tall.  His overall athleticism tho is pretty low. but I’m really starting to worry about processing and Vision.

        And again why does CLR run an RPO offense and set But never run the quarterback? That helps no one

      • #16528
        the909
        Participant

        I will agree with this. Sort of. He’s average when it comes to processing his reads, going through progressions. I’m curious on passing plays what the average time from snap to release is. I will say this, I don’t think we always get great separation from the wideouts, and I think he’s a lot more gun shy than say Darnold, who wasn’t afraid to gun sling it into a crowd.

        Also, I’m not a huge fan of depending on my QB to have 12-15 tuck and runs a game, leaving him open to getting hurt. And Riley is nowhere near as bad as Helton who would do that fake RPO and never run. But I do agree that the point of an RPO look is to give defenses hesitation, making sure the QB isn’t going to take off. Maybe not the best for JM’s skillset? I wouldn’t mind seeing us mix it up a tad. But again, of all my concerns about this team, the offensive play calling is like 54th and 56th in the big scheme of things.

        • This reply was modified 3 weeks ago by the909.
      • #16549
        Java
        Keymaster

        How many times you want your starting QB running downfield against SJSU?

         

        Yeah, thought so

    • #16550
      Java
      Keymaster

      Just an intro to reality versus PT hyperbole

       

      PT: I just don’t see why our QB doesn’t run the ball!  I mean, why run RPO when he does not run?

       

      Reality: Maiava Ran for 158 yards last year on 54 attempts.  I imagine some of those are sacks.

       

      Here’s a nugget.  Maiava led all FBS QB’s un rushing TD’s. 6. last season.

       

      Once again PT swings and misses.

      • #16559
        PasadenaTrojan
        Participant

        158 yards is a dynamic, multi dimensional RPO offense?

        over 12 games that is 13 yards a game.

        yes I want double that. Maybe triple. Our D always allows opposing QBs wide open lanes and there are times a QB can run, slide and not even get hit. JM Is a big dude. Let him run

        6 TDs is respectable. Could be a bunch of QB sneaks too. I mean…158 yards sort of implies that is the case

    • #16553
      Daystalker
      Participant

      So instead of bugs do you call him Shade now?

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.