Home › Forums › Football › Deepest Dive on Paterno Case I’ve Ever Read

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #18490
      PasadenaTrojan
      Participant

      Holy moly. This guy is in the weeds. Pretty Long read.

      I wish I could read this and be convinced Paternos statue should have been removed. just won’t happen tho. Im

      more convinced he’s innocent actually. And so is Sandusky.

      McCreary’s  rhythmic slapping sounds falls apart after changing story many times and many (including dates!) and victims who also changed their stories many times. And lots of background on investigations with 2nd mile allegations and why they were all dismissed.

      idk what happened. I do know convictions and destroying peoples legacy should only happen with irrefutable truth. Call me crazy

      Sandusky shouldn’t have showered with young boys. No question. That doesn’t make him a pedo. But it’s close. I get that. But boys saying later nothing happened will end an investigation. And changing their stories while being paid is not ideal.  But none of it has to do with Paterno. Him saying he wished he did more wasn’t a man of guilt talking it was a good man admitting he made a mistake. Not intentionally. Not a cover up. In retrospect. That’s called being humble. Not guilty.

      https://x.com/vexpith/status/2098560201787863185?s=46

    • #18492
      PasadenaTrojan
      Participant

      Remember OJ was found innocent in a court of law in 1990’s. Not quite the Jim Crow era

    • #18499
      saturdaysarebetter
      Participant

      Thank you Pasadena. So many already have closed their minds to any other possible conclusion. Like the Dreyfus Affair and the Duke Lacrosse team. Cognitive dissonance in not wanting to possibly believe they were wrong?

      • #18518
        PasadenaTrojan
        Participant

        Duke lacrosse is a GREAT comparison.  Sadly

    • #18504
      Java
      Keymaster

      You probably believe 911 was an inside job

    • #18506
      the909
      Participant

      If you think Sanudusky’s innocent, I don’t know what to say. What percentage of his accusers are now saying they don’t remember? One boy?

      Arguments for Paterno can be made and that to me is a fair discussion. But Sandusky? Any grown ass man who showers with boys is just a little more than sus.

      eta: One out of 10?

      • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 3 days ago by the909.
      • #18517
        PasadenaTrojan
        Participant

        Read the article. Much more then one fwiw

        agree on Sandusky. 100%. This is about him but it’s really about Paterno. And yes he is the one that had a 50 year legacy DESTROYED.

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.