Wild West Sports

Login

Epstein Files

Home › Forums › Politics › Epstein Files

  • This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1 week ago by mandb.
Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • October 2, 2026 at 4:46 pm #20515
      BigBalls
      Participant

      Sad and telling that pedophiles are being protected. Why? Expose these perverts. Why redact the names?

    • October 2, 2026 at 4:51 pm #20520
      the909
      Participant

      Maybe because the person in question is well known? Wealthy? Politically, um, connected. This isn’t a red/ blue issue. Which people tend to forget.

      • October 3, 2026 at 5:04 am #20588
        mandb
        Participant

        But it still begs the question: That email was dated 2014, when Obama was in office. Now his sickness didn’t start to come to light until after his arrest and ‘suicide’ in 2019 and the files were coming out.

        Why didn’t Biden release all the files? He was being called out to do it but didn’t.

         

    • October 2, 2026 at 6:52 pm #20542
      Daystalker
      Participant

      Doing a quick glance based on size of redacted box and spacing, it would appear that the name has 6 letters for the first name and 7 to 8 letters for the last.  The first name could potentially have more letters if the name had an I or two lowercase L’s.  Now, I know this is extreme speculation here, but the name Donald Trump would have the blacked out box sizes reversed from what they are or at least even based on the amount of space the lettering would take up.  Unless redacted to swap that out on purpose, in which case why not just do one black out, then this points to someone with a longer last name than first name, at least how the letters are arranged (back to the I or two L’s next to each other taking up less space).

      • October 2, 2026 at 7:38 pm #20546
        the909
        Participant

        At this point all redacted are speculation. Do I personally think he’s a pdf? No, not at all. Do I think he turned a blind eye with some of his known colleagues and – while not having evidence which is huge, and not being in a position of power either – chose to ignore some obvoius signs? Abslutely I do. I think it’s telling that he ended Epstein’s friendship not because of the well-known rumors about his taste in women/ girls, but because they stepped on each other’s real estate toes. Your friend being involved with under 18’s? No problem, after all I host teen pageants and enjoy walking into changing rooms. But cross me on real estate by buying something I wanted? Now that’s a line too far. So, is he a pdf? I highly highly doubt it. Is he contributing to speculation by refusing to have them release the files – something he pledged to do? Yes. Just release them and pull the bandaid. What is there to fear or to hide? And if Clinton or dems or independents are revealed, get em all equally. Stop protecting pdf’s.

        And for the record, he’s not the only one who befriended a pdf. Many did. But look at his spiritual adviser? Starting to look like creeps were and probably are in his orbit.

        Lie with dogs ge fleas

        • This reply was modified 1 week, 1 day ago by the909.
      • October 3, 2026 at 2:14 am #20583
        Daystalker
        Participant

        I do t get the whole guilt by association thing, my buddy used to bang really big ugly girls, like really ugly.  He said that he did it because they were so happy to get laid that they just did all the things to keep him happy that the others wouldn’t.  .  Good for him.  That doesn’t mean me or any of our other buddies did the same thing.  We stayed on the other side of the room when these porkers were around, they smelled.  If anyone ever accused me of doing what he did I would fight them on the spot, no words just fists.  Win or lose.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.