Home Forums Football USC -22.50 over UCLA

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #5112
      BigBalls
      Participant

      Geez, that’s a big number,

    • #5126
      RWC
      Participant

      Is that all? Thought it would be more than that to be honest, it’s the worst UCLA team I can ever recall.

      • #5136
        Java
        Keymaster

        I think it depends on whether Nico plays.  If he doesn’t I don’t see how UCLA is competitive.

         

        USC just got done playing 3 extremely physical football games, 4 if you count Nebraska.  Brutal stretch.

         

        If USC brings that level of physicality, they will beat UCLA 49-14  Which I think is what UW did.

    • #5127
      Fraud
      Participant

      Two really bad teams. Just like I am a really stupid poster

       

       

      • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 6 days ago by Java.
      • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 6 days ago by Java.
      • #5140
        Fraud
        Participant

        🙄

    • #5143
      RWC
      Participant

      I think the talent disparity is more of a problem for UCLA facing SC than a physical one. These teams have been pretty even talent wise the past 6 or 7 years but not this season. Advantage SC.

      • #5145
        Java
        Keymaster

        I just think when you look at the teams ucla has played the last few weeks. And the results.

        And do the same for USC?

        Jenni watched the uw ucla game it looked like an old pac game.  Uscs games against Oregon. Iowa northwestern and Nebraska were exceptionally physical.    I think if the bruins can be tricky and spread the field great.  But if they are going to try to win a war of field position or attrition I dunno man.  SC has just played 4 of those.

         

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.