Reply To: USC and their soft defense

[Butkus51]

No, U’re right about the other teams.  My take is all about USC.  I did not like how Iowa pushed them around 1st half.  LB’s & DB’s played soft = missed tackles, out of position, giving up big plays, got blocked hard, blowed coverage.  Yeah, I kinda disappointed with DC. DA Lynn and his AC dis year.  If he corrected stuff early on, USC = 9-1 right now.  The 2 losses is on the D all da way.

It’s good dat they fight back in the 2nd half, but dat’s not good FB and very risky.  Dat type of FB waste too much energy.  Plus, it puts too much pressure on da O to score pts and rally.  Top 10 teams do not play like dat.  Looks like U’re OK with our D, Kool Brah.  I’m not and feel DC. DA Lynn has done a poor job with the D.  If he had a top 18 to 20 ranked D, allowing only 14 pts a game, shoot USC would be 10-0…  Cheers

USC is ranked # 50 in nation = 347 ypg, #43 = 21.78 pts pg.

PS.  Guaranty the media people, coaches dat vote in polls see dat.  Dat’s why USC get ream in da polls.  In fact, I’v seen and read many criticism about USC D being soft and too many blown coverages.  I have not seen or read anyone saying good things about USC D.   So, I’m not a minority in my views about our D.