I started this poll on an unbiased site called footballguys after some of you were flapping your gums on he was a hall of famer. Very few times is there a poll with over 100 votes, two options and one option gets zero votes since there usually is atleast one person that does a troll vote. Over 120 votes and not a single person thinks Palmer is a hall of famer, even some commented in the thread they thought I was making a troll post.
To see this working, head to your live site.
Search
I have not followed his statistics but I would use three criteria to determine if a player should make the Hall of Fame:
Statistics & Ratings
Years of Play
Championships
This must be payback for pasadena's Aikman obsession.
@the909trojan he started his aikman obsession after i started bagging on palmer
I lumped all the trojan qbs together as busts and that triggered usc fans disagreeing about palmer, I started making fun of palmer with his hot dog eating commercials and dena got triggered and started turning it into an Aikman vs Palmer debate.
@BruinEngineer Got it. It's actually a good question. Objectively speaking. Answer is probably not due to the lack of playoff success, but the stats are there to make an argument imho.
Your Trojan obsession noted. Who cares?
He was a good player that was never the same after his injury.
Always represented USC well, good guy.
Letting the interception machine Aikman in because he was good at handing off a football makes the whole "hall" a joke. sc
Absolutely. It’s not his fault he played on shit teams.
His career numbers place far above guys that are in the HOF.
While it’s not that important to Me. I think he is. We tend to put way too much emphasis on end of season one game performance. Example. There were people who last year debated whether clayton kershaw was h til the Dodgers won the series. That’s ludicrous. And I think there are a lot of parallels between the two