Keep up with what? Your posts? In my sleep LOL. Yes the Pac12 refs called it what else is new. Yes they have such credibility. No it wasn’t reviewed BTW and that’s what the announcer called for. It’s a moot point anyway game over.
Wrong again both players on the ground with ball possession should stay with the offense. Announcer said the same thing it should have been reviewed. In fact the Pac 12 refs gave SC favorable calls all game like the bogus targeting that was overturned. SC sucks with that Swiss Cheese defense.
Keep up with what? Your posts? In my sleep LOL. Yes the Pac12 refs called it what else is new. Yes they have such credibility. No it wasn’t reviewed BTW and that’s what the announcer called for. It’s a moot point anyway game over.
Try to keep up.
He had the ball going to the ground.
your right i heard someone on the TV say that.
But the refs called it an INT. They also reviewed it no? And it was upheld.
Why do you ignore that?
This is a weird hill to die on. But you be you.
Wrong again both players on the ground with ball possession should stay with the offense. Announcer said the same thing it should have been reviewed. In fact the Pac 12 refs gave SC favorable calls all game like the bogus targeting that was overturned. SC sucks with that Swiss Cheese defense.
Lolol your wrong.
It went right through ND WRs hands into Steel‘s chest. Next
Possessing should have stayed with ND simultaneous catch by both players.
Ahhhh .... the old Kiffinesque 1st down fade pick just at the wrong place and wrong time so Kiffin the memories