Re: Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a
8/23/2010 11:49:25 AMBy: SOTrojan
I think one area where the NCAA may have exposure is they claimed that McNair received information from Lake regarding Reggie getting benefits, but Lake never told the NCAA what the NCAA claimed he told them.
Related Posts
- McNair wants to sue NCAA, not appeal (views: 689) -- SC66 (99.50.124.249) -- 8/22/10 07:52 PM
- One really important point (views: 342) -- SC66 (99.50.124.249) -- 8/22/10 11:05 PM
- The MILLION $$ question is: Will Reggie testify.. (views: 215) -- BobbyG (174.67.208.17) -- 8/22/10 10:42 PM
- I hope fluffy sues that piece of (views: 453) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:02 PM
- maybe there will be a class action (views: 269) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:03 PM
- Like I said yesterday... (views: 221) -- Pooh Bah (71.118.33.139) -- 8/22/10 09:36 PM
- try him at the haig (views: 189) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:06 PM
- This site has really gone to the dogs!! (views: 110) -- 28isnot41 (72.200.104.163) -- 8/22/10 09:25 PM
- every dog has its day (views: 86) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:28 PM
- It's "The Hague, Bill...noone spells it the haig (views: 105) -- stevers (76.115.8.151) -- 8/22/10 09:15 PM
- too much "Haig & Haig" Pinch? (views: 91) -- Hillside (99.167.103.229) -- 8/23/10 11:24 AM
- deleted (views: 57) -- Hillside (99.167.103.229) -- 8/23/10 11:23 AM
- when did that become one word??? (views: 85) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:18 PM
- He was referring to Peter Noone of his fave band (views: 106) -- ferd (76.174.241.172) -- 8/22/10 09:29 PM
- lol nm (views: 52) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:34 PM
- He was referring to Peter Noone of his fave band (views: 106) -- ferd (76.174.241.172) -- 8/22/10 09:29 PM
- This site has really gone to the dogs!! (views: 110) -- 28isnot41 (72.200.104.163) -- 8/22/10 09:25 PM
- maybe there will be a class action (views: 269) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:03 PM
- Serious question (views: 301) -- ucberkgrad (99.38.254.45) -- 8/22/10 08:56 PM
- I'd say Antitrust (views: 106) -- MVT (193.200.150.152) -- 8/23/10 11:38 AM
- Are Punitive (3x) Damages Possible? (views: 67) -- Hillside (99.167.103.229) -- 8/23/10 11:21 AM
- the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 258) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:15 PM
- Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 139) -- ucberkgrad (99.38.254.45) -- 8/23/10 08:42 AM
- Re: Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 102) -- SOTrojan (12.146.203.100) -- 8/23/10 11:49 AM
- Huge mistake on their part (views: 102) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/23/10 11:54 AM
- the lawyer has already taken the case (views: 123) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/23/10 10:11 AM
- Re: Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 102) -- SOTrojan (12.146.203.100) -- 8/23/10 11:49 AM
- He essentially can't work in CFB for a year (views: 150) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 09:21 PM
- Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 139) -- ucberkgrad (99.38.254.45) -- 8/23/10 08:42 AM
- Not an expert but I hunch it'll be eight figures (views: 253) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 08:07 PM
- and people wonder why Garrett reacted the way he (views: 213) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 08:47 PM
- McNair v. NCAA ...will the defense call its next (views: 405) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 08:01 PM
- My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 278) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 08:16 PM
- Re: My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 192) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 08:50 PM
- Tarkanian, asst. bb coaches, Okla and Ga (views: 179) -- SC66 (99.50.124.249) -- 8/22/10 10:59 PM
- USC should move quickly and seek (views: 259) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 08:41 PM
- I think seeking injunctive relief would be a (views: 71) -- GTrojan (76.88.226.11) -- 8/23/10 04:19 PM
- great point.... (views: 57) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/23/10 10:37 PM
- I'll be very pleased if a decision is made.... (views: 221) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 08:48 PM
- technically the appeals process is supposed (views: 172) -- SCtrojan2k3 (68.231.189.49) -- 8/22/10 10:02 PM
- Thanks...nm* (views: 56) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 10:35 PM
- thanks for the clarification..... (views: 103) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 10:09 PM
- technically the appeals process is supposed (views: 172) -- SCtrojan2k3 (68.231.189.49) -- 8/22/10 10:02 PM
- I think seeking injunctive relief would be a (views: 71) -- GTrojan (76.88.226.11) -- 8/23/10 04:19 PM
- Re: My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 192) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 08:50 PM
- My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 278) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 08:16 PM