Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a
8/23/2010 8:42:37 AMBy: ucberkgrad
Lexo....I'm not debating you, just wondering. Where did they call him a liar? Wasn't it they just showed areas of his testimony that were inconsistent with other findings? Can he prove his story is the accurate one?
Tookie...if he is that good he can find employment as a coach and then start recruiting next year. Plus, why didn't USC renew his contract if A) he was that valuable as a coach and B) his story was true? It would seem USC would want to keep him to show the NCAA they backed their guy and his story.
But let's assume he can't find work for a year and it was because the NCAA published FALSE statements about him....what are the damages? What does he make a year.
Anyway, seems like a pretty thin case. I'm sure some lawyer will take it, but you have to wonder how much time and money it will take to sue.
Tookie...if he is that good he can find employment as a coach and then start recruiting next year. Plus, why didn't USC renew his contract if A) he was that valuable as a coach and B) his story was true? It would seem USC would want to keep him to show the NCAA they backed their guy and his story.
But let's assume he can't find work for a year and it was because the NCAA published FALSE statements about him....what are the damages? What does he make a year.
Anyway, seems like a pretty thin case. I'm sure some lawyer will take it, but you have to wonder how much time and money it will take to sue.
Related Posts
- McNair wants to sue NCAA, not appeal (views: 689) -- SC66 (99.50.124.249) -- 8/22/10 07:52 PM
- One really important point (views: 342) -- SC66 (99.50.124.249) -- 8/22/10 11:05 PM
- The MILLION $$ question is: Will Reggie testify.. (views: 215) -- BobbyG (174.67.208.17) -- 8/22/10 10:42 PM
- I hope fluffy sues that piece of (views: 453) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:02 PM
- maybe there will be a class action (views: 269) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:03 PM
- Like I said yesterday... (views: 221) -- Pooh Bah (71.118.33.139) -- 8/22/10 09:36 PM
- try him at the haig (views: 189) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:06 PM
- This site has really gone to the dogs!! (views: 110) -- 28isnot41 (72.200.104.163) -- 8/22/10 09:25 PM
- every dog has its day (views: 86) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:28 PM
- It's "The Hague, Bill...noone spells it the haig (views: 105) -- stevers (76.115.8.151) -- 8/22/10 09:15 PM
- too much "Haig & Haig" Pinch? (views: 90) -- Hillside (99.167.103.229) -- 8/23/10 11:24 AM
- deleted (views: 56) -- Hillside (99.167.103.229) -- 8/23/10 11:23 AM
- when did that become one word??? (views: 85) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:18 PM
- He was referring to Peter Noone of his fave band (views: 106) -- ferd (76.174.241.172) -- 8/22/10 09:29 PM
- lol nm (views: 52) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:34 PM
- He was referring to Peter Noone of his fave band (views: 106) -- ferd (76.174.241.172) -- 8/22/10 09:29 PM
- This site has really gone to the dogs!! (views: 110) -- 28isnot41 (72.200.104.163) -- 8/22/10 09:25 PM
- maybe there will be a class action (views: 269) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:03 PM
- Serious question (views: 301) -- ucberkgrad (99.38.254.45) -- 8/22/10 08:56 PM
- I'd say Antitrust (views: 105) -- MVT (193.200.150.152) -- 8/23/10 11:38 AM
- Are Punitive (3x) Damages Possible? (views: 66) -- Hillside (99.167.103.229) -- 8/23/10 11:21 AM
- the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 258) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:15 PM
- Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 139) -- ucberkgrad (99.38.254.45) -- 8/23/10 08:42 AM
- Re: Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 101) -- SOTrojan (12.146.203.100) -- 8/23/10 11:49 AM
- Huge mistake on their part (views: 102) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/23/10 11:54 AM
- the lawyer has already taken the case (views: 122) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/23/10 10:11 AM
- Re: Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 101) -- SOTrojan (12.146.203.100) -- 8/23/10 11:49 AM
- He essentially can't work in CFB for a year (views: 150) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 09:21 PM
- Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 139) -- ucberkgrad (99.38.254.45) -- 8/23/10 08:42 AM
- Not an expert but I hunch it'll be eight figures (views: 253) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 08:07 PM
- and people wonder why Garrett reacted the way he (views: 213) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 08:47 PM
- McNair v. NCAA ...will the defense call its next (views: 405) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 08:01 PM
- My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 278) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 08:16 PM
- Re: My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 192) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 08:50 PM
- Tarkanian, asst. bb coaches, Okla and Ga (views: 179) -- SC66 (99.50.124.249) -- 8/22/10 10:59 PM
- USC should move quickly and seek (views: 259) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 08:41 PM
- I think seeking injunctive relief would be a (views: 71) -- GTrojan (76.88.226.11) -- 8/23/10 04:19 PM
- great point.... (views: 57) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/23/10 10:37 PM
- I'll be very pleased if a decision is made.... (views: 221) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 08:48 PM
- technically the appeals process is supposed (views: 172) -- SCtrojan2k3 (68.231.189.49) -- 8/22/10 10:02 PM
- Thanks...nm* (views: 56) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 10:35 PM
- thanks for the clarification..... (views: 103) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 10:09 PM
- technically the appeals process is supposed (views: 172) -- SCtrojan2k3 (68.231.189.49) -- 8/22/10 10:02 PM
- I think seeking injunctive relief would be a (views: 71) -- GTrojan (76.88.226.11) -- 8/23/10 04:19 PM
- Re: My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 192) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 08:50 PM
- My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 278) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 08:16 PM