how do you define a good QB?

By: Art_Vandalay



If it's best stats I'll give it to Matt.

I would LOVE to see Matt lead the UCLA team to 20 straight win when Ucla was ranked 114th in the nation in TOTAL fawking defense in 1998.

As bad as Matt L is in the NFL he is still a better NFL QB than Cade was because Cade didn't have a NFL arm or size. Matt has both although his arm isn't super. You can be a great college QB and sucky NFL QB just like Cade. I'd take Cade over Aikman, Matt L, Carson Palmer, ext.

Here are some good trivia questions for you?

Did Cade play with a OL that lasted more than one year in the NFL? Yes. Only 1.

Did Cades best WR play in the NFL? No. Bennett.

Did Cades TE play in the NFL? No.

Did Cades RB play in the NFL? Foster did but he didn't have Foster the entire time. THat's it.

Ask those same questions about Matt? Are you kidding me? What if Cade had that OL, TE, WR and RB's? Are you kidding? Top that off with Matt having the best Defense in the Pac 10 vs. Ucla's defense ranked number 114 in 1998.

Did Matt ever win 20 straight? Just curious. Seems like Matt could have won 20 straight with the talent around him even if he sat out those 20 games.

I won and I picked Cade. hahahahahahaa
Post Please Log in OR Register for an account before posting.