McNair wants to sue NCAA, not appeal
8/22/2010 7:52:57 PMBy: SC66
his appeal is a formality, he has hired a high priced Kansas City attorney who has taken the gig on a contingency basis and they are not doing that unless they feel he has a great case. This allows USC to act above the frey while Todd does the dirty work. And having followed this case for over five years, I believe that Todd has the NCAA by the balls. They can deny his appeal, be sued, and look like fools in court, or they can uphold his appeal and pay him a nice 7 figure settlement to go away, and since this would gut their case vs. USC, they would have to figure out a way to placate USC, which to me means, a substantail reduction in penalties. I don't believe that the NCAA wants the McNair case to ever see the light of a court case, which in my humble opinion is great for USC. Someone, in the future is going to write a book about this case exposing the NCAA for what it did to USC, and the sooner the better. fight on. Not a lawyer all you UCLA fans, just an opnion, but a fact based opinion. For those who disagree, read Todd's appeal, tell me where it is wrong and we can discuss.
Related Posts
- McNair wants to sue NCAA, not appeal (views: 681) -- SC66 (99.50.124.249) -- 8/22/10 07:52 PM
- One really important point (views: 328) -- SC66 (99.50.124.249) -- 8/22/10 11:05 PM
- The MILLION $$ question is: Will Reggie testify.. (views: 201) -- BobbyG (174.67.208.17) -- 8/22/10 10:42 PM
- I hope fluffy sues that piece of (views: 439) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:02 PM
- maybe there will be a class action (views: 255) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:03 PM
- Like I said yesterday... (views: 212) -- Pooh Bah (71.118.33.139) -- 8/22/10 09:36 PM
- try him at the haig (views: 177) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:06 PM
- This site has really gone to the dogs!! (views: 102) -- 28isnot41 (72.200.104.163) -- 8/22/10 09:25 PM
- every dog has its day (views: 77) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:28 PM
- It's "The Hague, Bill...noone spells it the haig (views: 97) -- stevers (76.115.8.151) -- 8/22/10 09:15 PM
- too much "Haig & Haig" Pinch? (views: 75) -- Hillside (99.167.103.229) -- 8/23/10 11:24 AM
- deleted (views: 46) -- Hillside (99.167.103.229) -- 8/23/10 11:23 AM
- when did that become one word??? (views: 75) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:18 PM
- He was referring to Peter Noone of his fave band (views: 94) -- ferd (76.174.241.172) -- 8/22/10 09:29 PM
- lol nm (views: 43) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:34 PM
- He was referring to Peter Noone of his fave band (views: 94) -- ferd (76.174.241.172) -- 8/22/10 09:29 PM
- This site has really gone to the dogs!! (views: 102) -- 28isnot41 (72.200.104.163) -- 8/22/10 09:25 PM
- maybe there will be a class action (views: 255) -- San Clemente (69.234.100.221) -- 8/22/10 09:03 PM
- Serious question (views: 291) -- ucberkgrad (99.38.254.45) -- 8/22/10 08:56 PM
- I'd say Antitrust (views: 96) -- MVT (193.200.150.152) -- 8/23/10 11:38 AM
- Are Punitive (3x) Damages Possible? (views: 58) -- Hillside (99.167.103.229) -- 8/23/10 11:21 AM
- the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 239) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 09:15 PM
- Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 124) -- ucberkgrad (99.38.254.45) -- 8/23/10 08:42 AM
- Re: Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 91) -- SOTrojan (12.146.203.100) -- 8/23/10 11:49 AM
- Huge mistake on their part (views: 93) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/23/10 11:54 AM
- the lawyer has already taken the case (views: 102) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/23/10 10:11 AM
- Re: Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 91) -- SOTrojan (12.146.203.100) -- 8/23/10 11:49 AM
- He essentially can't work in CFB for a year (views: 143) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 09:21 PM
- Re: the NCAA maligned his character in a (views: 124) -- ucberkgrad (99.38.254.45) -- 8/23/10 08:42 AM
- Not an expert but I hunch it'll be eight figures (views: 241) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 08:07 PM
- and people wonder why Garrett reacted the way he (views: 202) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 08:47 PM
- McNair v. NCAA ...will the defense call its next (views: 371) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 08:01 PM
- My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 270) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 08:16 PM
- Re: My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 179) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 08:50 PM
- Tarkanian, asst. bb coaches, Okla and Ga (views: 165) -- SC66 (99.50.124.249) -- 8/22/10 10:59 PM
- USC should move quickly and seek (views: 250) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 08:41 PM
- I think seeking injunctive relief would be a (views: 62) -- GTrojan (76.88.226.11) -- 8/23/10 04:19 PM
- great point.... (views: 40) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/23/10 10:37 PM
- I'll be very pleased if a decision is made.... (views: 212) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 08:48 PM
- technically the appeals process is supposed (views: 159) -- SCtrojan2k3 (68.231.189.49) -- 8/22/10 10:02 PM
- Thanks...nm* (views: 47) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 10:35 PM
- thanks for the clarification..... (views: 94) -- Lexo (97.93.51.2) -- 8/22/10 10:09 PM
- technically the appeals process is supposed (views: 159) -- SCtrojan2k3 (68.231.189.49) -- 8/22/10 10:02 PM
- I think seeking injunctive relief would be a (views: 62) -- GTrojan (76.88.226.11) -- 8/23/10 04:19 PM
- Re: My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 179) -- Tookie the Condor (96.244.82.107) -- 8/22/10 08:50 PM
- My only question, for either of you guys..... (views: 270) -- GNTrojan (76.95.204.130) -- 8/22/10 08:16 PM